Argumentation Schemes for Collaborative Planning
نویسندگان
چکیده
We address the collaborative planning problem in teams of agents where partners have different objectives and norms. In this context, agreeing on the best course of action to adopt represents a significant challenge. Concurrent actions and causal plan-constraints may lead to conflicts of opinion on what to do. Moreover, individual norms can constrain agent behaviour. We propose an argumentation-based model for deliberative dialogues based on argumentation schemes. This model facilitates agreements about joint plans by enriching the quality of the dialogue through the exchange of relevant information about plan com-
منابع مشابه
On the benefits of argumentation schemes in deliberative dialogue
We present a model of argumentation-based deliberative dialogue for decision making in a team of agents. The model captures conflicts among agents’ plans due to scheduling and causality constraints, and conflicts between actions, goals and norms. We evaluate this model in complex collaborative planning problems to assess its ability to resolve such conflicts. We show that a model grounded on ap...
متن کاملAn Empirical Study of Argumentation Schemes for Deliberative Dialogue
Collaborative decision making among agents in a team is a complex activity, and tasks to achieve individual objectives may conflict in a team context. A number of argumentation-based models have been proposed to address the problem, the rationale being that the revelation of background information and constraints can aid in the discovery and resolution of conflicts. To date, however, no empiric...
متن کاملArgumentation Schemes for Collaborative Debate of Requirement Risks in Software Projects
Managing risks in real-world software projects is of paramount importance. A significant class of such risks is related to the engineering of requirements, commonly involving the presentation and analysis of risk management arguments from both software engineers and clients involved in collaborative debates. In this work, drawing inspiration from argumentation theory in Artificial Intelligence,...
متن کاملArgumentation-Based Risk Management
Collaborative risk management is a fundamental task in project management. This paper discusses a new collaborative approach to risk management which is grounded on the integration of dialogue games and argument schemes from argumentation research. In particular, we propose a new dialogue game to organize risk discussions, and the exploitation of typical argument schemes for risk management on ...
متن کاملCollaborative Environmental Planning with GeoMed
Environmental planning usually involves a large number of decision makers with different backgrounds and interests. Appropriate decision making procedures are needed in order to jointly consider their individual approaches and achieve collaboration. This paper discusses issues involved in Collaborative Environmental Planning and reports work on GeoMed, a group decision support system for Geogra...
متن کامل